Encrypted | Login

AAPM has contracted with NCRP to provide each AAPM Member in good standing access and download privileges of electronically available NCRP reports, commentaries and statements. This report was prepared by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). The Council strives to provide accurate, complete and useful information in its reports. However, neither the NCRP, the members of NCRP, other persons contributing to or assisting in the preparation of this report, nor any person acting on the behalf of any of these parties (a) makes any warranty or representation, express or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any information, method or process disclosed in this report may not infringe on privately owned rights; or (b) assumes any liability with respect to the use of, or for damages resulting from the use of, any information, method or process disclosed in this report.

Commentary No. 034 - Recommendations on Statistical Approaches to Account for Dose Uncertainties in Radiation Epidemiologic Risk Models (2024) This is a members only link.

Price: $55 PDF (AAPM Members FREE)
Category: Commentary

Accurate exposure estimation in radiation epidemiologic studies is essential for reliable health risk assessment. Failure to account appropriately for uncertainties in dose estimation and model assumptions could lead to biased results in the evaluation of the radiation dose-response as well as incorrect confidence bounds for risk parameters. Assessment of absorbed dose is often subject to considerable uncertainties, and a variety of statistical approaches have been developed to incorporate dose uncertainties into the estimation and inference for the dose-response. The purpose of this Commentary is to provide a guide regarding available statistical methods for dose-response analysis that incorporate dose uncertainties, the types of studies to which the methods can be applied, and the advantages and disadvantages of the methods. This Commentary addresses studies of external and internal exposures and provides guidance on both shared and unshared uncertainty in the estimation of absorbed dose. Of particular interest are statistical methods for assessing dose-response in epidemiologic studies of internal emitters, for which doses are calculated using exposure and retention models with many parameters. Each parameter is associated with various sources and amounts of uncertainty.
This Commentary draws from and builds upon previous National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) commentaries and reports on closely related topics, including:
  • Commentary No. 14, A Guide for Uncertainty Analysis in Dose and Risk Assessments Related to Environmental Contamination (1996)
  • Report No. 158, Uncertainties in the Measurement and Dosimetry of External Radiation (2007)
  • Report No. 164, Uncertainties in Internal Radiation Dose Assessment (2009)
  • Report No. 171, Uncertainties in the Estimation of Radiation Risks and Probability of Disease Causation (2012)
  • Report No. 178, Deriving Organ Doses and Their Uncertainty for Epidemiologic Studies (2018)
The intended audience for this Commentary is dosimetrists, statisticians, epidemiologists, organizations, and decision makers concerned with evaluating health risks associated with exposure of cohorts to radiation.
This Commentary was prepared by Scientific Committee 1-28 on Recommendations on Statistical Approaches to Account for Dose Uncertainties in Radiation Epidemiologic Risk Models.

Scientific Committee :

  • Jonine L. Bernstein, Co-Chair
  • Harry M. Cullings, Co-Chair
  • Michael B. Bellamy
  • Benjamin French
  • Mark P. Little
  • Carmen D. Tekwe
  • Helen A. Grogan, Staff Consultant

DISCLAIMER
I Disagree
I Agree

Show list of all NCRP documents »