Encrypted | Login

2016 AAPM Annual Meeting - Session: Medical Physics Workshop: An Update on the Journal's Improvement Activities and Guidance on Writing and Reviewing Papers


Is the video above not showing properly? If not, try this link.

The video above is member-only content.

AAPM Administrative Policy 108 states that AAPM members-only content

  • shall not be shared in electronic or printed form with non-members*,
  • must be linked to through a url provided by AAPM,
  • shall not be stored on external drives or servers accessible to non-members.

*See policy for Exception regarding the AAPM Professional Survey

By accessing this page, you agree to comply with AAPM Administrative Policy 108.




Writing Good Scientific Papers and Responding to Critiques
Mitchell Goodsitt, PhD University of Michigan
goodsitt@umich.edu


Handout(s): 115-32261-394514-118369.pdf
When you have finished the video, you may watch again, browse/search all videos, go back to the previous page, or watch another video in this session (see below).



All videos in this session:
Vision for Medical Physics and Status of Current Initiatives - Jeffrey Williamson, PhD Virginia Commonwealth University
Improving Manuscript Quality Via Structured Reviews, Enhanced Scientific Category Taxonomy, and Outreach - Shiva Das, PhD Univ North Carolina
Watching →Writing Good Scientific Papers and Responding to Critiques - Mitchell Goodsitt, PhD University of Michigan
Q & A -
Graph includes 39 member loads and 1093 non-member loads (1132 total loads). Exclude non-member? A load is defined as someone coming to this page, not necesarily that they pressed play, or watched the entire presentation.