Program Information
Alternative K-Edge Filters for Low-Energy Image Acquisition in Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography
S Shrestha*, S Vedantham , A Karellas , University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA
Presentations
MO-FG-CAMPUS-IeP1-1 (Monday, August 1, 2016) 4:30 PM - 5:00 PM Room: ePoster Theater
Purpose: In Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM), Rh filter is often used during low-energy image acquisition. The potential for using Ag, In and Sn filters, which exhibit K-edge closer to, and just below that of Iodine, instead of the Rh filter, was investigated for the low-energy image acquisition.
Methods: Analytical computations of the half-value thickness (HVT) and the photon fluence per mAs (photons/mm2/mAs) for 50μm Rh were compared with other potential K-edge filters (Ag, In and Sn), all with K-absorption edge below that of Iodine. Two strategies were investigated: fixed kVp and filter thickness (50μm for all filters) resulting in HVT variation, and fixed kVp and HVT resulting in variation in Ag, In and Sn thickness. Monte Carlo simulations (GEANT4) were conducted to determine if the scatter-to-primary ratio (SPR) and the point spread function of scatter (scatter PSF) differed between Rh and other K-edge filters.
Results: Ag, In and Sn filters (50μm thick) increased photon fluence/mAs by 1.3–1.4, 1.8–2, and 1.7–2 at 28-32 kVp compared to 50μm Rh, which could decrease exposure time. Additionally, the fraction of spectra closer to and just below Iodine's K-edge increased with these filters, which could improve post-subtraction image contrast. For HVT matched to 50μm Rh filtered spectra, the thickness range for Ag, In, and Sn were (41,44)μm, (49,55)μm and (45,53)μm, and increased photon fluence/mAs by 1.5–1.7, 1.6–2, and 1.6–2.2, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations showed that neither the SPR nor the scatter PSF of Ag, In and Sn differed from Rh, indicating no additional detriment due to x-ray scatter.
Conclusion: The use of Ag, In and Sn filters for low-energy image acquisition in CESM is potentially feasible and could decrease exposure time and may improve post-subtraction image contrast. Effect of these filters on radiation dose, contrast, noise and associated metrics are being investigated.
Funding Support, Disclosures, and Conflict of Interest: Funding Support: Supported in part by NIH R01CA195512. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the official views of the NIH or NCI.
Contact Email: