Program Information
Margin Determination for Hypofractionated Partial Breast Irradiation
C Geady1*, B Keller2 , M Ruschin3 , E Hahn4 , N Makhani5 , S Bosnic6 , D Vesprini7 , H Soliman8 , J Lee9 , C McCann10 , (1) Ryerson University (2) University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, (3) University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, (4) University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, (5) Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, (6) Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, (7) University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, (8) University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, (9) University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, (10) University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario
Presentations
SU-F-J-130 (Sunday, July 31, 2016) 3:00 PM - 6:00 PM Room: Exhibit Hall
Purpose: To determine the Planning Target Volume (PTV) margin for Hypofractionated Partial Breast Irradiation (HPBI) using the van Herk formalism (M=2.5Σ+0.7σ). HPBI is a novel technique intended to provide local control in breast cancer patients not eligible for surgical resection, using 40 Gy in 5 fractions prescribed to the gross disease.
Methods: Setup uncertainties were quantified through retrospective analysis of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data sets, collected prior to (prefraction) and after (postfraction) treatment delivery. During simulation and treatment, patients were immobilized using a wing board and an evacuated bag. Prefraction CBCT was rigidly registered to planning 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) using the chest wall and tumor, and translational couch shifts were applied as needed. This clinical workflow was faithfully reproduced in Pinnacle (Philips Medical Systems) to yield residual setup and intrafractional error through translational shifts and rigid registrations (ribs and sternum) of prefraction CBCT to 4DCT and postfraction CBCT to prefraction CBCT, respectively. All ten patients included in this investigation were medically inoperable; the median age was 84 (range, 52-100) years.
Results: Systematic (and random) setup uncertainties (in mm) detected for the left-right, craniocaudal and anteroposterior directions were 0.4 (1.5), 0.8 (1.8) and 0.4 (1.0); net uncertainty was determined to be 0.7 (1.5). Rotations >2° in any axis occurred on 8/72 (11.1%) registrations.
Conclusion: Preliminary results suggest a non-uniform setup margin (in mm) of 2.2, 3.3 and 1.7 for the left-right, craniocaudal and anteroposterior directions is required for HPBI, given its immobilization techniques and online setup verification protocol. This investigation is ongoing, though published results from similar studies are consistent with the above findings. Determination of margins in breast radiotherapy is a paradigm shift, but a necessary step in moving towards hypofractionated regiments, which may ultimately redefine the standard of care for this select patient population.
Contact Email: