Program Information
A New Approach for Calculating Variable Relative Biological Effectiveness in IMPT Optimization
W Cao1*, K Randeniya2, P Yepes3, D Grosshans4, R Mohan5, (1) University of Houston, Houston, TX, (2) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (3) Rice University, Houston, TX, (4) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (5) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Presentations
SU-G-TeP3-1 (Sunday, July 31, 2016) 5:00 PM - 5:30 PM Room: ePoster Theater
Purpose: To investigate the impact of a new approach for calculating relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization on RBE-weighted dose distributions. This approach includes the nonlinear RBE for the high linear energy transfer (LET) region, which was revealed by recent experiments at our institution. In addition, this approach utilizes RBE data as a function of LET without using dose-averaged LET in calculating RBE values.
Methods: We used a two-piece function for calculating RBE from LET. Within the Bragg peak, RBE is linearly correlated to LET. Beyond the Bragg peak, we use a nonlinear (quadratic) RBE function of LET based on our experimental. The IMPT optimization was devised to incorporate variable RBE by maximizing biological effect (based on the Linear Quadratic model) in tumor and minimizing biological effect in normal tissues. Three glioblastoma patients were retrospectively selected from our institution in this study. For each patient, three optimized IMPT plans were created based on three RBE resolutions, i.e., fixed RBE of 1.1 (RBE-1.1), variable RBE based on linear RBE and LET relationship (RBE-L), and variable RBE based on linear and quadratic relationship (RBE-LQ). The RBE weighted dose distributions of each optimized plan were evaluated in terms of different RBE values, i.e., RBE-1.1, RBE-L and RBE-LQ.
Results: The RBE weighted doses recalculated from RBE-1.1 based optimized plans demonstrated an increasing pattern from using RBE-1.1, RBE-L to RBE-LQ consistently for all three patients. The variable RBE (RBE-L and RBE-LQ) weighted dose distributions recalculated from RBE-L and RBE-LQ based optimization were more homogenous within the targets and better spared in the critical structures than the ones recalculated from RBE-1.1 based optimization.
Conclusion: We implemented a new approach for RBE calculation and optimization and demonstrated potential benefits of improving tumor coverage and normal sparing in IMPT planning.
Contact Email: