Program Information
A Study of Cherenkov Light Generated and Collected in Plastic Scintillation Detector
L Archambault1*, P Papaconstadopoulos2 , J Seuntjens2,3 , H Bouchard4 , (1) CHUQ Pavillon Hotel-Dieu de Quebec, Quebec, QC, (2) McGill Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, QC, (3) McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, (4) CHUM- Hospital Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC
Presentations
TH-CD-201-4 (Thursday, August 4, 2016) 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM Room: 201
Purpose: to study Cherenkov light emission in plastic scintillation detectors (PSDs) from a theoretical point of view to identify situations that may arise where the calibration coefficient obtained in one condition is not applicable to another condition. By identifying problematic situations, we hope to provide guidance on how to confidently use PSDs.
Methods: Cherenkov light emission in PSD was modelled using basic physical principles. In particular, changes in refractive index as a function of wavelength were accounted for using the Sellmeier empirical equation. Both electron and photon beams were considered. For photons, realistic distributions of secondary charged particles were calculated using Klein-Nishina’s formula. Cherenkov production and collection in PSDs were studied for a range of parameters including beam energy, charged particle momentum distribution, detector orientation and material composition. Finally, experimental validation was made using a commercial plastic scintillation detector.
Results: In specific situations, results show that the Cherenkov spectrum coupled in the PSD can deviate from its expected behaviour (i.e. one over the square of the wavelength). In these cases were the model is realistic it is possible to see a peak wavelength instead of a monotonically decreasing function. Consequences of this phenomenon are negligible when the momentum of charged particle is distributed randomly, but in some clinically relevant cases, such as an electron beam at depth close to R50 or for photon beams with minimal scatter component, the value of the calibration coefficient can be altered. Experimental tests with electron beams showed changes in the Cherenkov light ratio, the parameter used in the calibration of PSDs, up to 2-3% depending on the PSD orientation.
Conclusion: This work is the first providing a physical explanation for apparent change in PSD calibration coefficient. With this new information at hand, it will be possible to better guide the clinical use of PSDs.
Contact Email: