Program Information
Introduction and Investigation of Effective Diameter Ratios as a New Patient Size Metric for Use in CT
R Lamoureux1*, L Sinclair2 , A Mench3 , I Lipnharski4 , C Carranza5 , B Cormack6 , S Bidari7 , L Rill8 , M Arreola9 , (1) ,Gainesville, FL, (2) ,Portland, OR, (3) Salem Health, Tualatin, OR, (4) University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, (5) University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, (6) UF Health, Gainesville, FL, (7) University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, (8) Univ Florida, Jacksonville Beach, FL, (9) University of Florida Health Science Center, Gainesville, FL
Presentations
SU-E-I-28 (Sunday, July 12, 2015) 3:00 PM - 6:00 PM Room: Exhibit Hall
Purpose: To introduce and investigate effective diameter ratios as a new patient metric for use in computed tomography protocol selection as a supplement to patient-specific size parameter data.
Methods: The metrics of outer effective diameter and inner effective diameter were measured for 7 post-mortem subjects scanned with a standardized chest/abdomen/pelvis (CAP) protocol on a 320-slice MDCT scanner. The outer effective diameter was calculated by obtaining the anterior/posterior and lateral dimensions of the imaged anatomy at the middle of the scan range using Effective Diameter= SQRT(AP height*Lat Width). The inner effective diameter was calculated with the same equation using the AP and Lat dimensions of the anatomy excluding the adipose tissue. The ratio of outer to inner effective diameter was calculated for each subject. A relationship to BMI, weight, and CTDI conversion coefficients was investigated.
Results: For the largest subject with BMI of 43.85 kg/m2 and weight of 255 lbs the diameter ratio was calculated as 1.33. For the second largest subject with BMI of 33.5 kg/m2 and weight of 192.4 lbs the diameter ratio was measured as 1.43, indicating a larger percentage of adipose tissue in the second largest subject's anatomical composition. For the smallest subject at BMI of 17.4 kg/m2 and weight of 86 lbs a similar tissue composition was indicated as a subject with BMI of 24.2 kg/m2 and weight of 136 lbs as they had the same diameter ratios of 1.11.
Conclusion: The diameter ratio proves to contain information about anatomical composition that the BMI and weight alone do not. The utility of this metric is still being examined but could prove useful for determining MDCT techniques and for giving a more in depth detail of the composition of a patient’s body habitus.
Contact Email: