Program Information
Robust Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Plan Can Eliminate Junction Shifts for Craniospinal Irradiation
L Liao1*, S Jiang2 , Y Li3 , X Wang4 , H Li5 , X Zhu6 , N Sahoo7 , M Gillin8 , A Mahajan9 , D Grosshans10 , G Lim11 , X Zhang12 , (1) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Houston, Houston, TX, (2) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Instit, Houston, TX, (3) Varian Medical Systems, Houston, TX, (4) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, (5) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (6) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (7) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (8) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (9) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (10) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, (11) University of Houston, Houston, Texas, (12) UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Presentations
TH-C-BRD-12 Thursday 10:15AM - 12:15PM Room: Ballroom DPurpose:
The passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) technique is the commonly used radiotherapy technique for craniospinal irradiation (CSI). However, PSPT involves many numbers of junction shifts applied over the course of treatment to reduce the cold and hot regions caused by field mis-matching. In this work, we introduced a robust planning approach to develop an optimal and clinical efficient techniques for CSI using intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) so that junction shifts can essentially be eliminated.
Methods:
The intra-fractional uncertainty, in which two overlapping fields shift in the opposite directions along the craniospinal axis, are incorporated into the robust optimization algorithm. Treatment plans with junction sizes 3,5,10,15,20,25 cm were designed and compared with the plan designed using the non-robust optimization. Robustness of the plans were evaluated based on dose profiles along the craniospinal axis for the plans applying 3 mm intra-fractional shift. The dose intra-fraction variations (DIV) at the junction are used to evaluate the robustness of the plans.
Results:
The DIVs are 7.9%, 6.3%, 5.0%, 3.8%, 2.8% and 2.2%, for the robustly optimized plans with junction sizes 3,5,10,15,20,25 cm. The DIV are 10% for the non-robustly optimized plans with junction size 25 cm. The dose profiles along the craniospinal axis exhibit gradual and tapered dose distribution. Using DIVs less than 5% as maximum acceptable intra-fractional variation, the overlapping region can be reduced to 10 cm, leading to potential reduced number of the fields. The DIVs are less than 5% for 5 mm intra-fractional shifts with junction size 25 cm, leading to potential no-junction-shift for CSI using IMPT.
Conclusion:
This work is the first report of the robust optimization on CSI based on IMPT. We demonstrate that robust optimization can lead to much efficient carniospinal irradiation by eliminating the junction shifts.
Contact Email: