Program Information

Dosimetric Assessment of the Salivary Glands in Head and Neck Tumour Patients Treated with Radiation Therapy

C Peixoto Xavier

C Peixoto Xavier¹*, B Costa Ferreira² , L Khouri³ , M Lopes⁴ , S Stathakis⁵ , N Papanikolaou⁵ , P Mavroidis⁵ , (1) University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Coimbra, (2) University of Aveiro, Coimbra, Coimbra, (3) IPOCFG, EPE, Coimbra, Coimbra, (4) IPOCFG, EPE, Coimbra, Coimbra, (5) University of Texas Health Science Center, UTHSCSA, San Antonio, TX

Presentations

SU-E-T-466 Sunday 3:00PM - 6:00PM Room: Exhibit Hall

Purpose: To estimate the correlation between different dosimetric indices and the clinical outcome, which was recorded at different time points after the treatment, regarding the structure of salivary glands in head & neck cancer radiotherapy.

Methods: 218 salivary glands from patients with head and neck tumours treated at IPOCFG from 2007 to 2013 were included in this study. The follow up of those patients consisted on weekly medical visits during the treatment that take about seven weeks. After that the patients had consults every three months. Treatment complications were graded using the RTOG/EORTC guidelines. The response of the salivary glands (both parotids, oral cavity and both submandibular glands) was analyzed for six time periods: 7th week, 3rd, 7th, 12th, 18th and 24th months after the start of the radiotherapy. The total dose distributions, converted to a fractionation scheme of 2Gy fractional doses, were used to calculate the DVHs and dose-response plots of salivary glands.

Results: The small differences obtained between the mean DVHs showed that patients should be grouped into: with complications (G1+G2) and without complications (G0). The mean dose/2Gy was 22.2±13.2 Gy (G0) and 33.2±8.0 Gy (G1+G2) for the 7th week, 31.9±9.6 Gy (G0) and 34.6±6.8 Gy (G1+G2) for the 12th month and, 32.9±9.3 Gy (G0) and 37.2±8.5 Gy (G1+G2) for the 24th month. The dose-response plots for the 7th week and 24th month were similar to the dose-response curves published in the literature.

Conclusion: In some cases, there were not major differences between the mean DVHs of the groups with and without complications in the salivary glands, when comparing them at different time periods. More radiobiological analysis should thus be made to estimate the clinical impact of those differences.


Contact Email: