Program Information

Range Effects in Proton Therapy Caused by Systematic Errors in the Stoichiometric Calibration

P Doolan^1,2*, M Dias^2,3 , C Collins Fekete^2,4 , J Seco² , (1) University College London, London, U.K, (2) Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, (3) Dipartamento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria - DEIB, Politecnico di Milano, Italy, (4) Departement de physique, de genie physique et d'optique et Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Universite Laval, Quebec

Presentations

SU-E-T-550 Sunday 3:00PM - 6:00PM Room: Exhibit Hall

Purpose:
The procedure for proton treatment planning involves the conversion of the patient's X-ray CT from Hounsfield units into relative stopping powers (RSP), using a stoichiometric calibration curve (Schneider 1996). In clinical practice a 3.5% margin is added to account for the range uncertainty introduced by this process and other errors. RSPs for real tissues are calculated using composition data and the Bethe-Bloch formula (ICRU 1993). The purpose of this work is to investigate the impact that systematic errors in the stoichiometric calibration have on the proton range.
Methods:
Seven tissue inserts of the Gammex 467 phantom were imaged using our CT scanner. Their known chemical compositions (Watanabe 1999) were then used to calculate the theoretical RSPs, using the same formula as would be used for human tissues in the stoichiometric procedure. The actual RSPs of these inserts were measured using a Bragg peak shift measurement in the proton beam at our institution.
Results:
The theoretical calculation of the RSP was lower than the measured RSP values, by a mean/max error of
-1.5/-3.6%. For all seven inserts the theoretical approach underestimated the RSP, with errors variable across the range of Hounsfield units. Systematic errors for lung (average of two inserts), adipose and cortical bone were
-3.0/-2.1/-0.5%, respectively.
Conclusion:
There is a systematic underestimation caused by the theoretical calculation of RSP; a crucial step in the stoichiometric calibration procedure. As such, we propose that proton calibration curves should be based on measured RSPs. Investigations will be made to see if the same systematic errors exist for biological tissues. The impact of these differences on the range of proton beams, for phantoms and patient scenarios, will be investigated.

Funding Support, Disclosures, and Conflict of Interest: This project was funded equally by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK) and Ion Beam Applications (Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium).

Contact Email: