June 14, 2012 | |
---|---|
New in this IssueWho sets the price of individual medical procedures? American Public Media report. Seeking CAMPEP Credits for WC 2102? - You must complete survey for each session by June 29, 2012 AAPM Task Group ReportCongressSenators Urge CMS to Reserve Radiation Services Pay Cuts Due To RUC Error MedicareCMS Approved Markedly Fewer RUC Proposals Last Year Meeting CalendarChapter Meetings: October 2012 2012 AAPM Summer School - Medical Imaging Using Ionizing Radiation: Optimization of Dose and Image Quality - June 24-29, 2012, San Diego, CA 2012 AAPM Annual Meeting : July 29 - August 2, 2012, Charlotte, NC |
To submit articles for future e-News, please email Make a Tax deductible
contribution to AAPM’s
Education & Research
Fund AAPM Website UpdatesAAPM issues statement supporting H.R. 2104 - CARE Bill AAPM releases Adult Routine Head CT Protocol Recommendations Adult Brain Perfusion CT Protocols Updated MN Requires Accreditation of Advanced Diagnostic Imaging Services by August 1, 2013 FDA announces a Public Workshop - Device Improvements for Pediatric X-ray Imaging, July 16, 2012 |
Career Services & Committee ClassifiedsCareer Services Ads as of June 14, 2012 AAPM Committee Classifieds as of June 14, 2012 |
|
CongressSenators Urge CMS to Reserve Radiation Services Pay Cuts Due To RUC ErrorThree Democratic senators are trying to get CMS to reverse pay cuts for cancer radiation services in the 2012 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule final rule, according to a letter to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The cuts were due to an error by the American Medical Association’s Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC). The practice expense relative value units (RVUs) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were reduced by 2 percent from the proposed fee schedule rule to the final version due to omission of seven equipment direct inputs when the RUC panel calculated the recommended pay rate. If allowed to stay in place, the reduction in payment could hurt freestanding cancer centers and the patients they care for, states the letter from Senators Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), Ben Cardin (D-MD) and Bill Nelson (D-FL). “Moreover, a payment reduction does not seem appropriate for this acknowledged error on the part of the RUC,” the letter states. MedicareCMS Approved Markedly Fewer RUC Proposals Last YearCMS last year accepted nearly 30 percent fewer physician payment recommendations from the American Medical Association’s (AMA) controversial Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) panel than in previous years. The physician specialty-heavy RUC panel has been sharply criticized by family physicians, who recently sent their own payment recommendations to CMS. CMS historically has accepted about 90 percent of the RUC’s physician payment recommendations and last year that acceptance rate dropped precipitously to about 60 percent... [see full article] |
|
The AAPM E-News is a collection of news and information that affects the field of Medical Physics. To unsubscribe from this mailing, click here. |